Very new to the show but it stands to reason if Mike could change Harvey’s mind and convince him to give him a shot, plop him down in front of board or anyone else for that matter and let him do his thing. Your name is on the sign. Doesn’t really make sense someone as charismatic and in control as Harvey couldn’t have pulled this off. Full disclosure I’m just starting the show and have a very poor understanding of the details, but the only reason can’t be “because they only hire people from Harvard”. Colleges make exceptions for child prodigies. when someone like mike walks and and proves what he can do, if it made an impact on Harvey in 5 min, just spend an hour convincing everyone else ffs.

I mean im on the 2nd last episode and wth , almost every character involved has smthn related to mike now? Man wow, (im watching suits for the first time). idk but this season is so much better than the others for now.

I know how the series ends and that he’ll come around, my sister’s a walking spoiler machine and I’ve watched the last few episodes of the show with her years ago.

But damn, watching Louis in season 4 is exhausting. I actually liked him a lot from the beginning and understood where he was coming from most of the time. But his behavior after finding out about Mike and using it as leverage to become name partner is ruining his whole character for me.

Every second Gabriel Macht and Eric Close shared a screen was pure gold. Tanner is basically the anti-Harvey except completely unhinged and lacking any of Harvey’s moral safety net.

Imagine a spin-off focused entirely on Tanner and instead of a sleek legal drama it’s a full-on dark workplace comedy. Does a Tanner-centric show actually have legs or is he strictly best used in small doses to annoy Harvey?

Imagine if in S9, samantha had any other lawyer than mike, he/she wouldn't have known that the bylaws have the "acting managing partner" clause and samantha's case would have gotten dismissed right there.

So my question is do lawyers really care about each case deeply as to go all in one every case like mike and harvey do?

Spoiler!!!!!!

This pic is from S7E13, and Paula tries Harvey’s coffee and claims she likes and asks what he put in it. He gives an uneasy smirk and says vanilla. Now I’ve rewatched this show at least 8 times and now I’m just realizing that back in the day, when Donna was first hired by Harvey, she gives him coffee with vanilla and he loves it. S7E13 happens just after he talks with Paula after their fight about how Donna is in his life and they made up by Harvey saying he’s gonna share more with her. Took me years to make this connection that he gave Paula vanilla coffee, something once again was introduced by Donna. Similar thing happens in later episodes when Harvey’s mom assumes Donna was the one who got them back to good terms….

Was watching Suits on peacock, but today, it says the title is no longer available for any seasons? Does anyone know what happened?? 😭

That’s the total combined number of blue folders that show up in all episodes from all seasons. I did the hard work. Now you know.

You’re welcome.

I believe many shows have the ability to teach you some "wisdom" for life.

For me personally in suits it was the "You don't go to someone with a problem, you go to them with a solution"

I tried to apply it and people respond great if you can deliver a solution instead of just a problem

What is something suits taught you for your life?

Season 1 episode 12 “Dog Fight”

As a diehard 24 and Suits fan, I can't get how this went over my head until I read Leslie Hopes filmography. Talk about how much difference a long hair makes on a woman's appearance.

What the hell did Hardman have on Jack Soloff? It was such a weird but compelling plotline and then they didn't do anything with it, IIRC? I know Hardman appears on Suits LA. Does Jack Soloff show up there too? This plotline drove like a season and a half, I got so frustrated with it.

Any scene with a table and place settings always ends abruptly with what was meant to be a meal turning into one or more angry would-be diners leaving before anyone can eat a bite much less order. Ugh.

I just started watching the show not to long ago, and I noticed that a lot of the characters especially early on tell Mike he needs to get thicker skin and not let people get to him so easily, but later in the show I see a lot of those same characters crying like 5 year olds when someone talks shit to them. So my question is which one is it. Cause these characters have an easy time telling Mike to get thicker skin and to "man up" yet a lot of them fail to take that same advice.

We find out that Louis has a specialty in Financial Crimes. Essentially, just good with understanding the financial world.

With this knowledge, you would assume the others would have something like this as well. However, throughout the whole run, it just seemed like Harvey, Jessica and Mike were just well versed in each type of law.

I know Harvey's was Criminal Law while he was at the D.A. office. But that never really followed him back to Pearson Hardman. Season 1 Episode 2, we see him work Intellectual Property Law. S1.E7 is Corporate and Business Law (Which I would expect more of especially with S2.E1) S1.E10, Financial Law. S2.E5, while assigned to Harvey, Mike takes this one for Family Law.

I get that there can be generalized practice but given the size of the firm, it seems like likely the case. I guess maybe to keep things fresh they let it ride?

Thoughts?

You were innocent and taken advantage of and are countersuing. Who do you pick and why?

I may be alone in this, but I love this character. Smart, doesn't take BS from anyone. I wish she was in more episodes.