This is what resentment turns into. She sacrificed all those things in order to give her husband everything he wanted. The resentment forms when the sacrifice isnāt acknowledged. He sees it as mutual. She didnāt. They didnāt properly communicate, for any number of reasons.
She sacrificed all those things in order to give her husband everything he wanted.
We are assuming this is everything he wanted with 0 evidence. In fact, he talks about sacrificing time with his children so that he could provide for the family.
They didnāt properly communicate, for any number of reasons.
I agree with this.
But the bigger factor is babies having babies. This forced a decision on them that meant that some party was going to be unhappy or resentful because the children weren't planned. The truth is, for their own happiness, they should have had an abortion, or to suck up and realize that they both made these choices and it is shitty of her to dump all this on him.
I think the point is that she made the initial sacrifice, and momentum carried them along the rest of the way. She knew it, he was oblivious.
Sometimes you can continue on the path youāre on because it makes sense, but know that itās not the original path you planned and that can be a little upsetting- even if youāre content enough where you are.
All of that is fair, but finally speaking up 18 years later to shit on your husband to your daughter speaks volumes about the quality of communication in this marriage.
I dont think anyone is the good guy here. Marriage takes work and that work is often ugly fights and unpleasant nights as both partners need to stand up for themselves while also being understanding of the others needs.
momentum carried them along the rest of the way. She knew it, he was oblivious.
a) momentum didn't carry it. at any point she could have tried to get off that ride. piling more kids on really fucked that up, which if everything I am being told is true, it "takes two to tango" but it is the woman's decision on whether or not to have an abortion and nothing a man can do can change that.
b) If she knew it, and didn't say anything, she is complicit as well. Dumping on her kids that their father robbed her of choice, is a really, really shitty way to parent and a super great way of making your partner feel like a complete piece of shit and make your kids resent their father. Great job!
I would imagine anyone doing this is 100% an emotionally manipulating asshole. Just like my mom!
It's inappropriate to be essentially blaming these choices in her husband and the children in front of them though.
Now they both probably feel like crap due to her bitterness.
She has her own agency/freewill and she should have communicated her wants/needs like an adult. Perhaps they should divorce if the resentment is too large to get past? Then she can finally go to nursing school! No one to blame anymore! I hate learned helplessness.
I think the point is that she made the initial sacrifice
did he ask her to do that, did they even talk about having a baby in the first place? the whole scenario could have been avoided if they hadn't gotten pregnant so soon.
It still reads as helplessness and entitlement. She is actively blaming marrying him and having kids on why she couldnāt do nursing school. As if so many of us donāt do school while we are parents. Planning takes bth parties, if she didnāt communicate that she wanted to figure out nursing school, and now she is resentful, she would likely benefit from therapy to help her take some ownership over her life and work on her communication. But making her husband feel guilty and throwing random snarky comments berating her daughterās father because of her being born, is just immature and unnecessary
Birth control in any form could have been a choice. Unless the husband forced her to have more kids she could have said not to have anymore and gone to school.
My wife and I have managed to not got pregnant for 22 years (since we specifically did not want kids). A vasectomy is about a grand out of pocket and if you have good insurance it will sometimes be partially covered.
Condoms + some form of hormonal BC are pretty much 100%
Pretty much is not 100%. Companies and doctors do not make 100% claims for a reason. The reason is because they cannot account for all forms or reasons of failure. You're anecdotal evidence does not stand up next to actual medical studies that repeatedly state there is no 100% effective method of contraception apart from abstinence.
From a strictly mathematical standpoint, youāre getting close to 99.99% effective when combining properly used condoms with properly used hormonal contraception methods. Which would be 1 in 1000 women becoming pregnant over the course of a year employing these methods.
Which with say roughly 800 million women worldwide using doctor offered methods of contraception, 1 in a 1000 is quite a lot of babies and still not 100%.
It's almost like birth control isn't 100% effective and in reality you have no idea whether or not they used anything.
I'm sorry, but I'm so sick of people assuming protection wasn't used if there is a pregnancy. It implies that all methods of birth control cannot fail and that is NOT the kind of misinformation that should spread any further.
Lol what a deluded take. FYI birth control is 100% effective when used correctly. The 99% effective is just people doing dumb shit like missing dosages, breaking or using expired condoms.
That's not true at all and no company selling any type of birth control would make it. Most claim between 95-99% with perfect use. There's so many things that can go wrong from drug interactions, undetected movement for coils to illnesses that even when used perfectly no contraceptives have 100% coverage. People have given birth with the coil stuck to their babies because it failed. A mild stomach bug or any number of medications can lower the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. In date condoms break or can slip. Even sterilisation and vasectomies can heal. There's no such thing as 100% contraceptives in straight relationships there is only abstinence which is not usually acceptable in marriages.
A coils and IUDs are placed by trained medical staff and sterilisations and vasectomies healing are not error or controllable by the person getting them.
First of all, which method specifically are you talking about? Because the shot, the patch, the pill, condoms, etc. all have different statistics in regards to failure. Would you like to do some research and try again when you are better informed?
Edited to fix an unfortunate typo that was a slurš„² I am so sorry.
Did you... Not read what I wrote? I am aware of the research. You are not, or you would have named the specific form of birth control along with the statistics for that specific type. You have some reading to do, good luck!
The chances of their baby coming from the extremely slim 0.001% chance of both birth control and a condom failing aren't worth assuming that was the case in this scenario
she also didnt have to keep getting pregnant. i also think its a weird way to view work as "having value" . most people just see work as a means to an end or having to provide for yourself or others. there's also ways to take course online etc. my family was unwealthy enough to where my mom HAD to work with 3 kids. we all make our choices. we all decide to communicate what we want or not. internally deciding "oh we cant" without a direct conversation with your husband about that want in 19 years is kinda trash.
This all happened allegedly years ago as the kids now are adults. And yes it was available to everyone back then
Itās also hilarious for you call this a privileged take as though each abortion want a painful and difficult decision that I made because I knew that we couldnāt afford more kids.
Now youāre just being obtuse and I am done trying to help you understand. We all have choices, every single one of us, including you, me, and even people in prison. Own your life and choices instead of playing victim
Yeah my main issue with this is she acts like she wasn't involved in the decision making here at all and the husband forced this path of life on her. She's the one that decided to keep having kids, its her body her choice, and having a kid means you can't really afford to be paying for one person to be going through grad school at the same time that makes life so much harder. And what was the husband supposed to do, he was the breadwinner, he was the one responsible for paying for all these increasing expenses. If she wanted to go to school that badly she could have put having kids on hold for 4 years and done so and then actually had a career for herself where she could have provided as well
Especially the fact that she's acting like the husband getting promoted and advancing his career is resent worthy. What was he supposed to do, stay at the same wage and not progress at all even though 3 kids worth of expenses came along? That needs more money obviously he's gonna go for promotions, but she acts like thats him being selfish when in reality its just him living up to his part of the situation
Iām a man. Whilst having a career can be rewarding, when you are old and facing the end of your life, you wonder whether the stay-at-home parent actually had it better in the long run. The job wonāt care when Iām dead and the kids will undoubtedly shed more tears at their motherās funeral than at mine.
I donāt know because Iām not a stay at home parent, we both work full time and have since my son was in pre-k. Most people have to both work and being a SAHP is a luxury
It's not always a "luxury." Sometimes the available jobs in the area pay less than the child care. This is how we ended up with a SAHP in my marriage for our kid.
I know this sounds crazy but that was our situation too and we just couldnāt get by with one income and also couldnāt afford child care, it made it tricky (opposite schedules helps) but itās still possible
Oh not saying it's crazy. Childcare is crazy expensive, and how to handle it is a difficult and complex decision that all sides need to come to a solution on, together. Was just pointing out being a SAHP isn't guaranteed to be a luxury. It can just be how one has to handle it.
I meanā¦.in the beginning itās not everything he wanted. It was the only option. Itās not his fault men donāt get pregnant. (I know itās Reddit but that still isnt a thing). Someone had to make money. Seems like she wanted him to read her mind. āIāve been saying it in small ways for year sā is BS.
She also could have said it in a way that didnāt tear down their dad in front of her.
But this line of thinking also frames him working a job as selfish. That it is a reward, or a luxary, for him. Working is a thing that most people HATE doing. It is a stressor for many people. I can imagine it never felt like a luxury for him.
Yes, there is the argument that as she was "denied" the opportunity to work, it would seem a luxury to her. However, that argument can also be levied on her. How many women would count her ability to be a stay at home as a luxury?
This is a conversation that should have been had over a decade ago, because this IS how resentment builds. Her feelings are valid, but that doesn't mean the "hints" made them obvious.
I have a feeling the complaints are more about his lack of contribution to the household as an equal partner, due to his belief that his only job is to āprovideā financially.
Many working men with stay at home wives assume their wife will take care of the kids and house 24/7 and donāt bother to do household tasks when they return home. So somehow they get to work 8-5, relax at night and weekends, and the SAHM basically works 24/7. THIS is what builds resentment, the fact that the unequal financial relationship leads to power imbalances within the family that pushes SAHMs to sacrifice quietly in a way that the working husband doesnāt have to. This is what the wife is warning the daughter about.
Women with truly equal partners do not complain about them.
She sacrificed all those things in order to give her husband everything he wanted.
did she though? she was pregnant and would be missing school when she had the baby - who would be funding her school and the household after a new baby arrived? And then they went and got pregnant again right after when she still didn't have a degree or job prospects. Again, who would be funding all of this if he stayed home with the kids while she went to school? maybe they should have put off getting pregnant in the first place.
75
u/Wolfegarde 9h ago
This is what resentment turns into. She sacrificed all those things in order to give her husband everything he wanted. The resentment forms when the sacrifice isnāt acknowledged. He sees it as mutual. She didnāt. They didnāt properly communicate, for any number of reasons.