r/PoursTea • 🫖 Mod ☕️ • 14h ago

FeministTea👩🏻‍🎓👩🏿‍⚖️👠🥾 Regrets And Perspectives

6.3k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/what-fresh-hells 12h ago

You think someone sacrificing their own career dreams, birthing your children, and caring for your home so that you can focus on your career signals that they do not appreciate you or your career?

2

u/Street_Estate2342 12h ago

Apparently not, because they literally called doing that a mistake.

0

u/what-fresh-hells 12h ago

She called sacrificing her dreams for his at a time when she could have chosen herself a mistake. It does not follow that she then believes every subsequent decision to have been a mistake or that she cannot appreciate his work or contributions to their family. She obviously does, given she literally enabled it with her sacrifices. She is encouraging her daughter to choose herself. She believes that her daughter can have love and a family AND her own dreams and goals. I dont think that idea is offensive.

5

u/Street_Estate2342 12h ago

Emphasis on why blaming the husband alone is unreasonable

It takes two people to have what happens here happen. It is unreasonable how she blames her husband alone.

In the third slide she says “you just made sure saying yes would destroy the entire system” that can’t be concluded based on the post’s information. The system could have been restructured to enable her to go to school, but she didn’t work with him and say “yes”.

Genderswapped example that still fits gender-norms

This is the gender swapped equivalent of a man-and-woman relationship where the man tries to saddle a massive bill on the woman that is equivalent to all of the things said man has bought for said woman (flowers, dinners, etc.)

The man still bought said items, literally enabled it with his time, effort, and money, but it makes it very obvious that he doesn’t value it.

The woman is doing the same thing here. Yes, she isn’t outright saying it, but it’s very obvious that she is saddling all the blame onto him for a two-person decision.

1

u/what-fresh-hells 12h ago

I think what she blames him for is that she ended up being the only one making sacrifices. Her goals and dreams never became a priority because their family system became organized around his goals. And at no point did he say hey, it's your turn. What do you want and how can I support you? That is why she is resentful.

Many young women are socialized to prioritize the needs of others over their own. They are taught that that is what it means to cooperate. Young men are unfortunately not socialized the same way. It probably never occurred to the husband that he needed to at some point actively do something in support of his wife's dreams, specifically because of the inertia that happens when a system is designed that works well enough for his own needs.

Husband felt like everything was fine. He wasn't sacrificing and he was getting everything he wanted. He was blind to his wife's sacrifice and unhappiness. That is precisely why she felt the need to warn her daughter.

It feels like one small sacrifice now. It can easily lead to a lifetime of small invisible sacrifices that leave you wondering how you ended up living your life for someone else, specifically for someone else who doesnt even recognize that he asked you to and passively let you at every turn.

3

u/Street_Estate2342 11h ago

Ultimately, we are the bearer of our own futures. It is absurd to saddle this solely on him.

It’s not a bad story, and how to collectively work towards each others’ dreams in a fair way is extremely valuable in relationships.

A good example of something that is very unfair from the post is that, on the ninth slide, the wife noted that only the husband has a retirement account. That is very bad. There should be a different retirement account for both of them. That example, and that rhetoric overall, is a good thing that men and women can take from this story.

However, acting like this is solely the man’s responsibility, and claiming that the man having a career makes his sacrifice of the time with his kids “less valuable” than the woman’s sacrifice of her career is very very very bad.

Idk, I would not be able to move past this. This would kill my feelings for someone. Edit: actually on further thought I could. Actions speak louder than words. It would call for some big conversations though.

2

u/what-fresh-hells 11h ago

Hearing that your wife is deeply hurt by the choices you've made would kill your feelings for her? That's unfortunate, and could easily explain why many women wouldn't communicate this kind of hurt and regret. Why they might suffer silently, raise their kids, then the divorce "comes out of nowhere."

In a partnership, decisions should be made together. The burden of sacrifice should be shared. And yes, you should feel some responsibility for doing the work of making your partner happy.

He knew she wanted to go to nursing school. He knew it kept getting put off. He knew it was easier and more convenient for him to keep moving forward with the system they had worked out than it would be to sacrifice and reorganize so that her goals could be the priority. She resents him that he was not willing to do what she had done for him.

He never made her dreams his priority. Hearing that probably hurt. But the healthy response to this, once you regulate the initial anger, is investigation. Ask questions. Try to figure out a solution. What does she need from you? That is what love is. It is not meant to only flow toward you. It is something you must actively do toward your partner as well. Even when their feelings and what they need from you make you feel bad. That discomfort is not reason enough to dismiss your partners feelings.

1

u/Street_Estate2342 11h ago

Hearing that your wife is deeply hurt by the choices you've made would kill your feelings for her? That's unfortunate, and could easily explain why many women wouldn't communicate this kind of hurt and regret. Why they might suffer silently, raise their kids, then the divorce "comes out of nowhere."

The hurt does not come from the choices I made, but being blindsided by stacking resentment that wasn't communicated. To be more precise:

It's not the choices I made. It would be the choices we made. It's a mistake between both parties and one party's inability to accept responsibility is a damning problem. Those that suffer silently for this suffer by their own hand. Again: we are the bearer of our own futures. It is absurd to saddle this solely on him. The divorce was an inevitable consequence of a failure to communicate, from both parties. Hopefully you will do better in your own relationships like I now have the opportunity to, hence the benefit of this post.

In a partnership, decisions should be made together. The burden of sacrifice should be shared. And yes, you should feel some responsibility for doing the work of making your partner happy.

We agree, yes.

He knew she wanted to go to nursing school. He knew it kept getting put off. He knew it was easier and more convenient for him to keep moving forward with the system they had worked out than it would be to sacrifice and reorganize so that her goals could be the priority. She resents him that he was not willing to do what she had done for him.

Again, this is way too much blame on him. The only slide that indicates she communicated says "she said she had been saying it in smaller ways for years. I only heard complaints about schedules and laundry." If you don't change it you choose it. She made small attempts, and didn't change it, so she chose it. Just like the husband saw the nursing school kept getting put off, and didn't change it, so he too chose it. They are both to blame for this.

He never made her dreams his priority. Hearing that probably hurt. But the healthy response to this, once you regulate the initial anger, is investigation. Ask questions. Try to figure out a solution. What does she need from you? That is what love is. It is not meant to only flow toward you. It is something you must actively do toward your partner as well. Even when their feelings and what they need from you make you feel bad. That discomfort is not reason enough to dismiss your partners feelings.

Neither did she. She never made HER dreams HER priority. You can't blame the husband for something that she couldn't even do herself.

2

u/what-fresh-hells 10h ago

This conversation wasn't actually asking him for anything. In fact the conversation was not even with him. It's a mother sharing her experience with her daughter and the husband having feelings about it.

Making her dreams a priority is not something she could have done alone. That is literally the point. Her sacrifice was built into their family system. Going after her dreams would have required changing that system. From the post, we see that she did raise the issue multiple times. He dismissed it as mere complaints. He did not have the will required to work with her to make the pursuit of her career possible.

If something requires the active participation of both partners, and one partner is content to never say yes this is important im ready to help you, yes, the other partner is likely to become resentful.

She wanted and needed him to demonstrate that he saw her goals as equally important and worthy of effort. He did not do that. And she is warning her daughter to not create a similar pattern in her own life.

1

u/Street_Estate2342 10h ago

Making her dreams a priority is not something she could have done alone. That is literally the point.

It's not something he can do alone either. How are you asking people to see it from her perspective when, while reading his perspective, you can't even see it from his?

If something requires the active participation of both partners, and one partner is content to never say yes this is important I'm ready to help you, yes, the other partner is likely to become resentful.

If you can't fight for your own dreams with the person you are building your life with then there's no hope on that dream! This is insanity.

She wanted and needed him to demonstrate that he saw her goals as equally important and worthy of effort.

She doesn't even see her goals as equally important and worthy of effort!

 she is warning her daughter to not create a similar pattern in her own life.

While a noble cause, she is doing so by blaming her husband for it. If she does not take equal responsibility in her dreams not coming to fruition, then she is making a damning error.

2

u/what-fresh-hells 10h ago

You're right. It isn't something he can do alone. That is not how partnership works. But it is something he needs to signal a willingness to prioritize and a willingness to work with her on it. If when she brings it up, he dismisses what she has to say as "complaints," how exactly is she supposed to change the fabric of her family system on her own? And do you actually find it reasonable that if she wants to go back to work, the entire responsibility for making that happen falls to her?

Some of you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how partnership works.

1

u/Street_Estate2342 10h ago edited 10h ago

You're right. It isn't something he can do alone. That is not how partnership works. But it is something he needs to signal a willingness to prioritize and a willingness to work with her on it. If when she brings it up, he dismisses what she has to say as "complaints," how exactly is she supposed to change the fabric of her family system on her own?

You're claiming she brought it up, but according to the post, she was only bringing it up "in smaller ways", that is not bringing it up. That is misleadingly presenting the seriousness of the issue. She did not bring it up, she obfuscated it and brought something else up because she wasn't willing to fight for her dream. She decided that the risk of damaging the family system was too high to fight for it.

do you actually find it reasonable that if she wants to go back to work, the entire responsibility for making that happen falls to her?

The responsibility of making it crystal clear how much she values this falls to her. The communication of how she personally value things and how she personally feels has to fall on her. There's no one else who can communicate that desire than her. That is what she failed to do, that is why she said she brought up small things because she could not communicate this. Once that is communicated, then the husband can help, until then, he can't see an issue that isn't brought up.

Some of you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how partnership works.

You don't understand how to champion for yourself. I worry about your own dreams if you can put yourself in this woman's shoes cause she didn't fight for her dream at all and is now vicariously trying to live through her daughter fighting for her dreams. If you really think that she actually fought for her dreams based on this post then you are for certain failing to fight for yours.

2

u/what-fresh-hells 10h ago edited 10h ago

So she's wrong when she presents the issue in smaller ways, but she's also wrong to present it as a big issue because he's been blindsided? Make it make sense.

Lol I understand how to champion myself. I never would have put my dreams on hold for my husband without a very concrete plan for when they would be prioritized. I'm the daughter in this scenario. I watched my mother do the sacrificing. I listened to my dad gleefully brag about how my mom sacrificed her law career to "be available to the children." My mom told me when I left for college to never let a man convince me to sideline my dreams for him and to always have some money set aside that he doesnt know about for your own safety.

You will not convince me that this mother is doing anything other than teaching her daughter to protect herself. More women should have these conversations with girls. And maybe with their sons as well. The sacrifices of women to make society function are far too invisible.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/StreetCollar2708 11h ago

He wasnt sacrificing? You ever have to take care of someone else? Now multiply that by 5. Either dude was incredibly lucky. Or he spent a massive amount of time at work. Maybe he liked it, but he did say tat he sacrificed time with his children, and that was brushed off like it was nothing. I don't think you realize how much time he actually had to give up to provide for 5 people. Time for hobbies, time for his children, time for anything else besides work. She's not the only one to have made sacrifices, but to belittle his life they were nothing? That's absurd.

1

u/what-fresh-hells 11h ago

I never said he didnt work hard. What I said was, in a conversation about sacrificing ones dreams and goals, she sacrificed hers in order to support his. At no point did he make the effort to do the same for her. Their family became organized around her continued sacrifice of hers, and his continued focus on his. She is advising her daughter not to make the same mistake. To focus on her own dreams while she can, and to perhaps pursue the kind of partnership where sacrifice is more evenly distributed or avoided, rather than treated as necessarily hers to bare.

1

u/StreetCollar2708 11h ago

Where did it say she sacrificed her dreams for his? They simply said she sacrificed her dreams because she got pregnant. You're adding stuff to the story that isn't there. She just regrets having had kids and not being able to pursue a career

1

u/what-fresh-hells 11h ago

The entire conversation is about how she sacrificed her goal of becoming a nurse. That is the issue at hand. I am not adding that. It is the central conflict.

Yes. She got pregnant. Something they did together. The pregnancy could have been met with any number of solutions. The solution they chose is the one in which her dreams were put on hold and she became the primary caregiver. And that same pattern repeated throughout their lives together. The mother is letting her daughter know how easily and how quickly sacrificing your dreams for someone else can become part of the machinery of your relationship, and she is advising her not to make the same mistake.

1

u/StreetCollar2708 11h ago

You are adding to it though. Here you said the conversation was about her sacrificing her dreams of becoming a nurse. Above you say she was sacrificing her dreams ( of becoming a nurse) to support his. Whatever his are, since they're not mentioned. That is definitely adding to it. So again, she regrets having kids because she had to put her dreams on hold for them.

0

u/what-fresh-hells 10h ago

The conversation was about their careers. Hers was sacrificed. His was supported. The daughter is considering making a sacrifice similar to her mother's. Her mother is saying don't do it. This is not complicated. What she regrets is that the sacrifice became entirely hers and permanent, and is not even recognized as a sacrifice.

It does not then logically follow that because she regrets one sacrifice she thus also must regret her children and her entire life. That's a ridiculous logical leap.

→ More replies (0)