r/mildlyinfuriating • u/DataDoctorX • 26d ago
Ruined by Technology Prime is censoring certain words in subtitles
We counted 4 separate words censored.
Edit: P****** S*** W**** B****
7.3k
u/A_Queer_Owl 26d ago
this is more than mildly infuriating, imo. this is Amazon telling deaf and hard of hearing people that they're not mature enough to read swear words, furthering the infantilization that disabled people face every day.
2.0k
u/Garlic-Rough 26d ago
Also, how would you distinguish r***** and r***** right? It f***** changes the f***** meaning or the depth of the line.
713
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
159
86
u/Thenderick 25d ago
I thought it was pussy
63
u/ForensicPathology 25d ago
Yeah, I knew it looked too long, but me too. Egregious censorship just makes the brain assume it's a different word which defeats the whole point.
→ More replies (1)12
→ More replies (3)22
141
u/Ramblonius 25d ago
Yeah, I've just been thinking about it. youtube subtitles also censor everything, and, like, hey, fuckface. If you think it's fine to say out loud, it's fine to put into subtitles, or you're literally treating customers worse because they have a disability.
→ More replies (2)119
u/Linesey 25d ago
Indeed.
Personally, i hate subtitles and keep them off whenever possible, so I have no personal dog in this fight.
But the very concept drives me fucking nuts.
Subtitles should be an exact transcript of what is heard. Word for word accurate, No censorship, no weird edits, honest to god accurate. obviously reasonable additions for captioning non-word audio.
If, a service wishes to provide as an option censored subtitles, that’s fine. but it needs to be an option, and the default needs to be real subs.
Much as subtitles benefit folks who are crunching their chips too loud to hear, or whatever else, they are first and foremost an accessibility aid, and must be treated with accuracy and fidelity to the source.
Now, if the audio censors something, of course the subs should too. but that’s different.
69
u/just_a_person_maybe 25d ago
I've seen a bunch of content creators censoring their subtitles with jokes, like swapping out "asshole" or "idiot" for the name of a politician or something and it drives me nuts for this reason. Sure, maybe the joke is funny, but captions are not the place for jokes. No one hides jokes in alt text for images. No one should be putting funny spins on captions. They're for accessibility, not comedy.
Also, I hate the stupid "speaks foreign language" shit. That's not equal access.
→ More replies (17)27
u/Meeping-Meeps 25d ago
As someone hard of hearing I feel this super hard. There's this one popular YouTuber that does his own captions, which is great on paper, but they are also not correct and filled with jokes, with every comment talking about how "funny" it is and no one taking into consideration what captions are actually for, as much as I enjoy their videos I can't watch them without a lot of difficulty
92
u/Wjreky 25d ago edited 25d ago
Lawsuit from the ADA? Please? Could be fun
Edit: I meant the AG in regards to the ADA but I'm stupid sometimes 🤦🏽♀️
42
u/blehblableb 25d ago
The ADA is a piece of legislation, not an entity.
51
u/Simbians 25d ago
The American Dental Association would like a word. but I don't think it's about censorship.
6
u/Legitimate-Bug-9553 25d ago
I fully forgot about the ADA legislation and thought you were saying that an Assistant District Attorney wasn't a person/entity and was briefly very confused 😆 (Importantly, not American, and only know ADA from SVU/Law and Order 😅)
34
25
u/blehblableb 25d ago
And it's a violation of FCC standards. It's probably a mistake, and can be reported right from the Prime platform.
35
45
→ More replies (7)6
8.3k
u/AngstyPup 26d ago
I can’t figure out what word this is supposed to be, and once someone says it, I’ll feel like an idiot.
6.5k
u/Outside-Pear9429 26d ago
"You were supposed to be a pervert." From Jack Reacher. https://www.tiktok.com/@moviedigest1/video/7254984556346969349
5.7k
u/AngstyPup 26d ago
No way: that’s so fucking tame!
2.0k
u/Asron87 26d ago
You were supposed to be pussies!
I mean that’s how I read it but fuck this censorship.
539
u/Spoda_Emcalt 25d ago
"You were supposed to be a princess"
→ More replies (2)201
→ More replies (2)84
u/TheUsagiTsukino 25d ago
There's an "a" before the p word. It'd have ti be pussy singular to work grammatically and the censored word is longer than that
115
→ More replies (8)21
352
u/Erick_Brimstone 26d ago
Fuck censorship
91
→ More replies (1)55
u/tid_burglar 25d ago
reddit used be one of the very few apps to not censor anything but in past few years, idk for what reason but censorship has hit reddit like a fucking bullet
94
u/fuckyeahglitters 25d ago
Reddit does not fucking censor words. It's the people.
→ More replies (19)6
u/Shienvien 25d ago
Reddit itself doesn't, but a number of specific subs absolutely do (and the sitewide modbot is not too happy about some words and combinations of words, either, so that's neither here nor there).
→ More replies (1)15
u/Beautiful-Affect1930 25d ago
that's a huge joke, volunteer mods always had basically free reign to censor whatever they wanted and they absolutely did. not to mention that all the big subreddits got infiltrated by bad actors a decade ago who would control narratives. I mean we all know Ghislaine Maxwell was running a bunch of the biggest subreddits and using it to post pro-pedophilia propaganda.
54
u/Neinstein14 25d ago
They seriously censor words that are not even swears? Just so they dont “trigger” certain butterflies??
At the minimum this should be an optional opt-in feature.
→ More replies (18)8
104
295
25
36
34
u/allnaturalfigjam 26d ago
My first thought was pistachio
30
u/ForkMyRedAssiniboine 26d ago
Woah, okay, I get that we have free speech and all, but please watch the salty language.
→ More replies (14)33
1.7k
u/Witty-Draw-3803 26d ago
Oh, well fuck the deaf, I guess
(excuse me: f*** them)
434
u/SymmetricDickNipples 26d ago
Better censor "deaf" too just to be safe
293
14
→ More replies (2)23
u/HereOnCompanyTime 26d ago
Oh, well f*** the d***, I guess
That looks better. Everyone is happy now.
→ More replies (1)16
992
u/AFedoraNamed_Key 26d ago
Find me in the alps
- Vegita I think
293
u/Foreign_Penalty_5341 25d ago
No no, you mean Luck be in the air tonight
→ More replies (1)9
97
48
→ More replies (9)7
260
153
u/anjschuyler 26d ago
oh, I was just watching Chicago on Crave and they did this constantly. (One line was changed from 'Go to hell' to 'Take a hike.' They changed 'shit' to 'spit') It was so frustrating because I know that's not what they're saying. It must be so annoying for HOH/deaf people.
→ More replies (1)89
u/gomax6 25d ago
HOH here, can confirm it’s maddening, hell, there are shows out there where whatever they used to make the subtitles isn’t even close to the English audio so I literally can’t watch some things without going crazy, I hear enough to be able to pick up on the audio so when the subtitles differ in any way it just sucks since it’s not the same words and I have to do mental gymnastics to link the two together
→ More replies (1)24
u/PickledCorvid 25d ago
Not HOH but I have noticed this especially with Netflix shows that are translated. The English dub and the English subtitles are COMPLETELY different translations, so much so that it changes the characters personalities and tone of the show. It baffles me why they would even bother to translate it twice and why the two translators seem to be at odds with each other. Also hard to watch because you can’t use both subtitles and dub, you have to pick one.
22
u/Beaticalle 25d ago
Translations are a different thing. Translated subtitles have more freedom to be accurate to the original dialogue, while dubs often try to match the cadence and lip movements of the actors' speech, so that ends up causing differences in translation. If you're watching the dubbed version, though, the subtitles should be accurate to the dub for consistency like you said and it's a big problem if they don't.
436
u/User_man_person 26d ago
isnt this outright challenging the authority of the americans with disabilities act?
110
u/ReluctantNerd7 25d ago
Accommodating people with disabilities interferes with profit.
Which one do you think Jeff Bezos cares about?
→ More replies (5)67
u/Android19samus 25d ago
I cannot imagine that accurate subtitles actually interfered with profit
16
u/Isbay 25d ago
shareholders are pussies though that’s got something to do with it
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)16
u/YourMomonaBun420 25d ago
I had a Sheriff's deputy almost arrest me because I called him out on running a speed trap from a handicap parking spot access isle.
I only said, "ADA violation!" loud enough for him to hear me from 10 feet way through his slightly opened window.
→ More replies (1)
398
u/Outside-Pear9429 26d ago
The correct answer for others wondering: "You were supposed to be a pervert." Jack Reacher. scene: https://www.tiktok.com/@moviedigest1/video/7254984556346969349
→ More replies (1)448
u/Ramblonius 25d ago
PERVERT? There are literally a dozen swear words starting with p that you would have to go through before you would ever even consider pervert. This isn't just insulting to anyone who needs subtitles, this is actively confusing.
→ More replies (1)120
u/petrichorax 25d ago
'You were supposed to be a pussy'
Only one I can think of, but yeah I hate this too.
That and youtube/tiktok demonitizing people for saying 'suicide' or 'corona virus' making people have to come up with stupid fake words for things like 'unalive' and 'unknown virus of unknown origin'
→ More replies (4)81
u/djm03917 25d ago
The spread of the word "unalived" makes me, probably irrationally, angry. Especially when I'm on reddit and I see a post about suicide and there's people arguing and using the term "unalived themselves". It feels so disrespectful and demeaning to me. I've known someone who did though, so maybe that's a factor.
47
u/YouMisssedTheTypo 25d ago
I don't think it's irrational, I think that phrase is disgusting and unimaginably disrespectful. If I killed myself and someone said that about me, I'd haunt their ass. It sickens me how such an important and serious topic is spat upon because it might theoretically drop ad revenue on our fucked internet where everything needs to be monitized always.
14
u/Vorpeseda 25d ago
There's absolutely ways to talk about something respectfully without actually saying certain words, people have been doing that for a long time.
But these new terms come across as especially insulting and mocking. I assume some degree of malicious compliance is the point, since for the viewers rather than the algorithm, just using the actual words is less offensive.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Outside-Pear9429 25d ago
No you're absolutely right and I feel the same. That and "grape" and probably others. It trivializes some very serious issues that warrant being talked about like adults, and I doubt it even avoids triggering anyone since people are still very clear on what's being discussed. And in many cases I don't think people are even doing it to avoid harming anyone, at this point a lot of internet users are just doing it to be cute or funny or whatever the hell reason people use other slang. I wish I had the authority to ban anyone using those words in spaces where it's not even necessary.
163
u/firenest 26d ago edited 26d ago
Once they get enough complaints about the asterisks making it unreadable, they will start using word substitutes like "grape" and "pew pew".
→ More replies (4)51
126
u/bauspanderu 25d ago edited 25d ago
So deaf people aren't allowed to "hear" swear words anymore? That's literally discrimination
Edit: removed irony, because it's not ironic
27
u/Pink-frosted-waffles 25d ago
I remember reading that you can contact the ADA office and file a complaint about that.
→ More replies (2)
61
u/steven_plays321 25d ago
OR WHEN THEY PUT [Speaking Foreign Language] IT PISSES ME OFF SOOOOO MUCH
→ More replies (3)14
254
u/TheUsagiTsukino 26d ago
Well that's pretty ***. How are you supposed to * ****?
→ More replies (8)77
u/DataDoctorX 26d ago
*, I *. I mean, I did ***, right??
→ More replies (3)35
u/amrfallen 26d ago
Well it turns out, ****** the **** ***** traffic cone ****ing in the ** as **** ***.
→ More replies (1)15
u/DataDoctorX 26d ago
Aww, well *. Now I can't * up the farmer's ***** when he ***** a wood ****!
→ More replies (2)9
50
u/RichieRocket 26d ago
Censoring words have to extremely annoying for deaf people.
→ More replies (1)
105
u/ExpBalSat 26d ago edited 26d ago
Are they beeped in the audio? if so, it makes sense that there is parity in the subtitles. If not - that's weird/infuriating to censor one and not the other.
113
u/DataDoctorX 26d ago
Nope, not at all
176
128
u/FreeRealEstate313 26d ago
Pervert
147
u/flanigomik 26d ago
really? is that something that needs censoring now? i hate this planet
122
u/Pipe_Memes 26d ago
The Epstein Class feels targeted by words like that.
37
u/flanigomik 26d ago
"but think of the childeren!.... no not those ones, do nothing about them, we got it"
→ More replies (2)11
u/GSDTippyTappies 26d ago
Yeah, it's pervert. They set him up at the bar, they told her he was a perv and she was sent over to his table as bait, except he didn't fall for it.
6
25
u/One-Bird-8961 25d ago
Utterly stupid all this over-the-top censorship, regardless of which platform. Verbal censorship, text censorship, image censorship,individual letters, words. Some sentenced are almost impossible to decipher due to all the blanked-out words. Not allowed to say killed, gotta say un-alived etc, etc.
Sexual assault. Can't say it, text version has to be censored. blah, blah, blah.
→ More replies (1)14
22
u/The_Celtic_Chemist 25d ago
Netflix skips over words like this all the time. Sometimes they even skip words or adjust phrases that have no swearing. They should have some respect for the writers and the audience, but at least they're consistent.
→ More replies (2)8
u/Quiet_surprise79 25d ago
I haven't subbed to Prime or netflix for a while and I keep seeing more and more reasons to be happy about that. The FOMO is totally gone.
18
17
15
13
u/SelectSympathy5718 25d ago
If it’s some kind of oh no think about the children, couldn’t they just censor some of the vowels in the word p*rv*rt. it’s clear for adults and not for children. What’s p***** supposed to be?
→ More replies (1)17
u/AncleJack 25d ago
How is the word pervert bad anyways?
→ More replies (1)13
u/Informal_Process2238 25d ago
The Epstein class consider it a slur that attacks them
→ More replies (1)
39
u/ColdFreezer 26d ago
Is this not a setting you can change?
38
u/DataDoctorX 26d ago
I hope so. Prime changed it to censor the words, so hopefully somewhere I can change it back.
→ More replies (3)16
u/ColdFreezer 26d ago
I don’t use prime but it would be insanely dumb if there wasn’t a way to toggle this.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)8
u/DVus1 25d ago
Kind of. Apparently, its only if you use CC subs. Using non CC subs does display "pervert."
→ More replies (1)
13
u/FixingOn 25d ago
Imo, it shouldn't be legal to provide captions which censor words that aren't censored in the audio. Infantilizing disabled individuals should count as a violation of protective laws that prevent discrimination. If someone who can hear the film can know what the word is, there's no valid reason to leave someone who needs captions in the dark.
10
10
u/Horrific_Necktie 25d ago
If I had to guess, these subtitles are made by an AI and the AI has a no no list in order to prevent it putting bad words where they dont belong. Putting them back where they do belong would require either human intervention or better AI, and both cost money. So its cheaper to just censor all of it.
8
u/CuttingOneWater 26d ago
isnt "pervert" like the tamest possible way to say that sentence? its not like an unnecessary curse word or sm
10
9
u/SaintOfPride201 25d ago
Hate this padded-walls ass world we live in now. These are shows meant for adults to watch, stop infantilizing adults and let us see the fuck word.
If they can show skin-slapping tiddies-bouncing extremely graphic depictions of sex, disgustingly gory blood and guts, and depictions of death, suicide, and other heavy themes, they can let us see the goddamn fuck word.
9
u/ST0H3LIT 25d ago
Don’t you know? Us deaf and hard of hearing people are too delicate to read certain words. Our eyes could fall out!
8
u/Ardyanowitsch 25d ago
I'm trying to decipher the censored word. Unfortunately it's not pigeon. One letter too short.
→ More replies (2)
9
u/iBreezyChan 25d ago
i noticed this on crunchyroll when it was veryyyy clearly using AI to generate captions. it was censoring the word “balls” when i was watching DRAGON BALL.
24
u/Chickennoodlesleuth cheddar 26d ago
So annoying, I wouldn't know what this is trying to say
→ More replies (20)
6
u/Mood-Rising 26d ago
I bet there is a tv broadcast deal where those words are required to be censored and they used that file for the subtitles. Streaming services are bad about using the wrong English subtitles, but usually it’s just dialogue mismatches.
→ More replies (3)
8
u/PinkOneHasBeenChosen 25d ago
What was the censored word? I can’t think of any vulgar word that starts with P and has more than 5 letters.
→ More replies (3)
8
7
u/animetidddies 25d ago
Amazon also does not have a viable way for deaf people to contact Amazon Locker Support. There is only a phone number, and the phone number has no RTT/TTY option. There is no chat support offered for Amazon Lockers. They offer no accessible option for deaf or hard of hearing people, which is also discrimination. Additionally, the Amazon Locker Support does not seem to understand what a deaf or hard of hearing person even is or what their needs are. I had the most frustrating experience trying to help my HOH Grandma with an issue related to an Amazon locker. They kept asking to speak to her and I repeatedly had to explain that she cannot hear, but they repeatedly did not understand that.
Amazon does not care about and discriminates against deaf people in many ways.
This is especially ironic because Amazon produced the movie “The Sound of Metal”, a movie about a deaf man and his journey entering the community and coming to terms with his new diagnosis.
I hate Amazon so much.
6
u/saviorofGOAT 26d ago
Serious question... If you're deaf would you register a beep in your head? Would that depend on when you became deaf?
→ More replies (1)
5
u/GenericFatGuy 25d ago
This non-consesunal mass babyification of society from unelected corporations is insane.




24.0k
u/DathomirBoy 26d ago edited 19d ago
This is discrimination, like actually. Deaf people need accurate captions, there’s no reason to censor words and make them guess. Youtube does this too.