r/SipsTea • • Aug 30 '26

SMH Intentionally blocking photoshoot

18.8k Upvotes

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

290

u/DookieShoez Aug 30 '26

She got out of the way of people using the stairs fool

443

u/Stevenstorm505 Aug 30 '26

She fucking looked right at the camera, stopped and then started fiddling with her phone before they came towards her. She was blocking the photo. And normally I would be all about it, but this chick wasn’t even doing anything wrong or cringe. She was just trying to take a wide shot of her and the art.

15

u/ImmediatePiano6690 Aug 30 '26

Can't help but feel like it's engagement bait, especially as the woman moves pretty much immediately as the other gets back.

80

u/pylond Aug 30 '26

I feel like it took me way too long to find a sensible comment here. I will happily agree that influencers mostly suck. Taking this picture/video would have hurt nobody. The lady just wanted a good shot of her with the art and that old biddy took it upon herself to ruin it. There was no need for it. The influencer lady waited until the area was mostly cleared and was not interfering with anyone. I just don’t understand all the hate she seems to be getting.

11

u/Brilliant_Dot3916 Aug 30 '26 edited Aug 30 '26

I'm glad I found you here lol. I also don't understand the hate

3

u/Ishmael75 Aug 30 '26

Sometimes it’s just “woman does thing” and people get all mad about it. If it was a dude taking a selfie at a football game no one would be mad.

2

u/ThatGuyBench Aug 30 '26

Dont you think, especially given that the old lady is old, and thus likely bit slower in the head, when she looked at the camera, it might have been a moment of "The fuck is that? Ah some camera thing. Where was I? Lets check the phone."

Just because she looked at the camera, does not mean that she put the pieces together and realized that she is blocking a photo. And at least my own experiences with the elderly, make me think that this is what happened, rather than any actual malice was intended.

3

u/EntertainerSuper8933 Aug 30 '26

Yes, especially if it was a selfie with a tripod or some kind of setup. She sees it but doesn't know what she is looking at (blank stare) and then she sees the family coming and moves to the right side of the stairs, as one does in the US, to let them pass, while finishing up looking at her message. Then she moves on. This had NOTHING to do with the girl up above, who she wasn't even really aware of.

3

u/downsideup9494 Aug 30 '26

Just because someone is a senior doesn't mean they are "a bit slower in the head". Grow up. Anyone could have unintentionally blocked the photo. Young people, their faces buried in their screens, are far more oblivious of their surroundings than older folks.

2

u/ThatGuyBench Aug 31 '26

Don't get me wrong, I didnt mean to imply that I could not be as oblivious as the old lady. Actually the reason why I wrote the comment is because I absolutely can imagine myself being unintentionally just as oblivious as the old lady. I am not trying to suggest that I am any better here.

Dunno, to me it seems like you are trying to make a big deal out of nothing here.

-1

u/ItzDaGod Aug 30 '26

You must be joking, she has a smart phone in her hand

2

u/ThatGuyBench Aug 31 '26

Yes indeed she has a smart phone in hand. She is aware smarphones exist and she obviously can use one herself.

Your point is what?

Therefore she obviously must be able to discern whether some random phone on some stand aimed in her general direction must mean that its a picture in progress, which she is blocking? Surely its not possible that it would be lets say some timelapse photo? Surely it cant be anything fucking else as far as she is concerned, and that her brain didnt run the whatsthephonepurpose.exe function deeply enough? /s

She was already reaching to her phone well before she stopped, what looked like intentional blocking of the photo when she sidestepped was obviously to let the passerbys pass, and she was not able to see the girl behind her either way.

Is it possible that she did this deliberately? Yes. Is it something that can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that she did that deliberately? Absolutely not.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

-1

u/Aicethegamer Aug 30 '26

Rage bait ahh comment

-3

u/pylond Aug 30 '26

What?? She looked and positioned herself to block the young lady. This has malice AND intent written all over it.

4

u/EntertainerSuper8933 Aug 30 '26

I just disagree. I don't even think she was particularly aware of the lady who passed her on the stairs. Out of sight out of mind. And then she sees someone below or some kind of tripod rig for selfies, but it doesn't even register on her face at all. She looks blankly, steps aside for people coming up, finishes her phone business and moves on. At most, she delayed lady's selfie by what, 30 seconds? Calm down, y'all

0

u/pylond Aug 30 '26

That would be ignorance. She was ignorant of her surroundings. Again something I was taught, by a woman of this woman’s generation, to be aware of at all times. So at best she was ignorant of her surroundings resulting in her actions being wrong and at worst she intentionally blocked the camera. Considering she LOOKS AT THE CAMERA and positions herself in a way that blocks the young woman I gotta say it’s the latter scenario. Either way old woman is in the wrong while young lady was very co signage of what was going on around her and waited for an opportunity where she wasn’t disturbing anyone.

2

u/EntertainerSuper8933 Aug 30 '26

Ignorant is exactly right. She has no idea that she is doing anything wrong

1

u/Glad_Landscape2177 Aug 31 '26

The museum has a no video and no tripod rule. So not very good awareness and still very much in the wrong.

2

u/Lyrael9 Aug 30 '26

She was pulling her phone out of her pocket before she looked at the camera. She clearly just didn't know and why would she.

The young woman wasn't doing anything wrong, but it was a bit clueless. It looks busy and people just aren't going to notice, they're looking at the art and living their own lives. If there was a person holding the phone for the photograph it might have been more obvious what was going on.

2

u/Few-Mall-8263 Aug 30 '26

She was pulling her phone out before she saw the camera. I think this old lady was just taking her time in an art museum... which is kind of what you're supposed to do.

5

u/baitones Aug 30 '26

She wasn’t blocking the photo she just didn’t care

1

u/youngintel Aug 30 '26

I currently date someone who takes their own photos like this all the time (usually with their back cameras so its even more inapparent). You’re severely misunderstanding how many people are actually aware of someone randomly dropping their phone and walking off is them filming themselves - let alone a 50/60 year old woman. Ive seen it a million times, half the people look at the phone confusingly unaware of the person standing off in the distance before going about their business.

She moved from oncoming foot traffic and then proceeded forward when sensing foot traffic approaching from behind like most people do when messing with their phone in the middle of an active walkway. Not everybody is approaching the world through the lens of constant social media content creation.

1

u/FUNKANATON Aug 30 '26

might not have been obvious to the non selfie generation

1

u/jules-amanita Aug 30 '26

Stopping in the middle of a public staircase to look at your phone is rude/potentially dangerous regardless of the photo. Get out of the way and then look at your phone. This is like the geezers who walk into the grocery store and then stop right inside the entrance to pull up their coupons.

1

u/Icy_Account6442 Aug 31 '26

I don’t know, she literally was going to pull her phone of her pocket before she looked at the phone. She didn’t seem to notice the girl putting it there. Now the phone position could have made her decide to be an asshole and block the shot or maybe she just thought it was weird. I think her moving out of the way of the people though was 100% valid. As a result she blocked the frame.

On another notes isn’t it wild that this brief encounter has spawned another reality. That lady could just have forgotten she saw the phone because she’s old 😂. Social media really is wild.

-31

u/[deleted] Aug 30 '26

[deleted]

-2

u/Next-Value9507 Aug 30 '26

Okay Karen.

-61

u/Blue_Swirling_Bunny Aug 30 '26

...for the purpose of "influencing" which will then cause followers to overrun the place. White hair is a hero.

34

u/mothje Aug 30 '26

I agree, how dares she, influencing people to go look at art.

2

u/Accountformorrowind Aug 30 '26

Thank God for phone women telling me what I should find interesting

4

u/blzrlzr Aug 30 '26

Art is meant to be consumed by the privileged so they can understand the struggle of the masses. Not for the masses to think they can achieve privilege.

4

u/Next-Value9507 Aug 30 '26

Not sure if sarcasm or ......

4

u/Capable_Pineapple993 Aug 30 '26

How tf is this being upvoted lmao

0

u/blzrlzr Aug 30 '26

It’s a joke

1

u/Capable_Pineapple993 Aug 31 '26

Well I don’t understand jokes

0

u/mothje Aug 31 '26

We would've never guessed.

-1

u/kmcmanus2814 Aug 30 '26

Because it’s obviously satire?

6

u/yipy2001 Aug 30 '26

Art has many purposes, and is not confined to your understanding of it.

1

u/blzrlzr Aug 30 '26

Ya man, I know. This would be an insane take if I were serious.

2

u/Flurmpy_ Aug 30 '26

Poe's law, friend

10

u/Next-Value9507 Aug 30 '26

Oh no, a museum makes more money. God forbid we support the arts and the places they're kept for viewing and restoration, even at the behest of someone taking a picture of themselves.

2

u/Centerpeel Aug 30 '26 edited Aug 30 '26

For what it's worth... My wife and I went to a concert and this girl was in attendance. My wife, out of nowhere, starts speaking with her in Portuguese. Im like how does she know this person? My wife had just moved here to the states. My wife started telling her how much she helped her through college because this girl does educational content and my wife consumed a lot of it when she was in university.

Shes not really an influencer in the way you are alluding to. Her name is Débora Aladim.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 30 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-21

u/SteveMarck Aug 30 '26

She wasn't doing anything wrong except the annoying thing she was doing...

6

u/Ilikeyounott Aug 30 '26

Wow. Some people are so miserable. How did you turn that way? 

15

u/[deleted] Aug 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/SteveMarck Aug 30 '26

What does touching grass have to do with someone setting up a tripod on a staircase?

5

u/craige22 Aug 30 '26

Since when taking selfies in a museum annoying now?

-1

u/SteveMarck Aug 30 '26

It's not just a selfie though, you don't need to set up a tripod for that. She's doing the influencer thing where she thinks she owns the public space.

1

u/SensualMortician Aug 30 '26

Incel response.

0

u/SteveMarck Aug 30 '26

Nope. Happily married. Nice try though.

1

u/SensualMortician Aug 30 '26

Married but out here dunking on young women doing normal shit. Bet your wife is proud of you.

0

u/SteveMarck Aug 30 '26

Influencer nonsense should not be normalized.

1

u/SensualMortician Aug 30 '26

Have people not been setting up tri pods to take pictures at the eiffel tower, the Vatican, statue of liberty, and holy shit, even art galleries for ages? You have beef with young people doing it, and thats weird, because you forgot an entirely common use of a camera just to shit on someone.