r/Hydrology • • 3d ago

HECHMS HMR 52 Storm

Can someone ELI5 if I need to not use the standard HMR52 storm if I am interested in durations less than 72 hrs hours? I don't think I fully understand how other durations are nested within. Thanks

1 Upvotes

3 comments sorted by

1

u/NewToTheGPU 3d ago

Hey! Assuming you are not in a state with a PMP study available, I would refer you to HMR-52 Section 2.3. I did this for a very small site (<10 sq miles), so I didn't have to worry about storm position.

My interpretation of the steps layed out in Section 2.3 are below:

  1. Get HMR-51 Duration-Depth data for all durations up to the chosen storm duration

For example: If I want to create a 24-hr PMP, I would get the 6, 12, and 24 hour PMP depths from HMR-51.

  1. You need to create 6-hr incremental depths. This provides your hyetograph shape and if done correctly, result in the correct total volume.

For my example: I need 4, 6-hr incremental depths for a 24-hr duration storm. Let's say the HMR-51 values for the 6, 12, and 24 hr are 30, 35, and 40 inches, respectively for my location.

The incremental depths for a 24-hour PMP can then be defined as follows: a.) 6-hr PMP Depth b.) 12-hr minus 6-hr PMP Depth c.) 24-hr minus 12-hr PMP Depth Divided by 2 d.) 24-hr minus 12-hr PMP Depth Divided by 2 (again)

This makes it so the applicable PMP intensities are experienced during the duration of the 24-hr PMP event.

  1. Arrange the incremental depths to form hyetograph

This has some rules as well as subjectivity.

The rule is: The two least intense 6-hour intervals must be placed at the beginning and end.

The subjectivity is: The most intense 6-hour interval can be placed at any interval that is not the beginning or end, so in the case of the 24-hr PMP, we can either place it from hours 6-12 or 12-18.

So two valid organizations of the incremental depths set in Step 2 are possible for a 24-hour PMP:

c,a,b,d c,b,a,d

Note: c=d

You can then choose organization based off sensitivity testing. Let's say in my example, c, b, a, d was the order that caused the highest flow at my watershed outlet.

So in the end, my incremental 24-hr PMP hyetograph would be:

0-6hr: 2.5 inch 6-12hr: 5 inch 12-18hr: 30 inch 18-24hr: 2.5 inch

This nesring accomplishes our main goals with the design storm based on our depth-duration information:

Experience 30 inches in 6-hours Experience 35 inches in 12-hours Experience 40 inches in 24-hours

You could likely do a similar methodology for the 48-hour. For 6-hour or lower durations, I think you are at the mercy of your state funding a PMP study.

Hope this helps!

1

u/Throwaway20230510 3d ago

Thank you, so does the HMR52 storm in HECHMS actually automate this process to determine the most critical depth and duration, or is it just computing what you described for a 72hr duration?

1

u/NewToTheGPU 3d ago

From my understanding, it is more or less doing what I described. However, in HMS it has a bunch of parameters for positioning (X, Y, Orientation, etc.). The subjectivity piece of my explanation is handled in the "Peak Intensity" drop down. The 1 to 6 hour ratio shapes that really intense 6-hour intensity. For my project, I did not consider the 1 to 6 hour ratio and assumed the peak intensity 6-hour period was uniformly applied.

From my understanding, HMS is not finding critical depths. It is only alternating the depths from the HMR-51 depth duration curves to come up with a 72-hour. hyetograph.