Say you are 33 years old and you are married to a 31-year-old, and you met when you were 20, she was 18. What is the morality of going back in time with your current knowledge to when you were 15 years old and trying to end up with your current wife. You would be able to do amass a huge fortune with your knowledge of future world events, but mentally, you would be almost 20 years older than your wife.

If this is a repost just nuke me from orbit.

EDIT: Guys I’m sorry for reposting I really had no idea. But I’m not deleting this because you people are funny.

Someone just pulls out their guitar in public and start playing it.

Without warning you come up and feed them their teeth.

Moral?

I'd just really like to know what the parents expected to achieve with this. What was the point?

Nothing else to do with the Backrooms. Just the act of eating the people

How would you morally assess/classify and rank each 4 of these vengeful parents who have expressed or acted upon desires to kill those they blame for their child's deaths

Slide 1: Mrs. Nancy Loomis (Scream 2)

Her serial killer son was shot and killed in self-defence. Refusing to accept his guilt, she launched a calculated mass murder spree to kill his innocent surviving victim, Sidney

Slide 2: Detective Wayne Bailey (Scream VI)

His serial killer son was killed in self-defence. He abused his police authority, stole evidence, and encouraged his 2 surviving children to become serial killers to get revenge on those who killed his son.

Slide 3: Pamela Voorhees (Friday the 13th)

Her son drowned due to counselor negligence. Driven by grief-induced psychosis, she spent her life murdering completely random teenagers who came to the camp years later.

Slide 4: May Martinez (Real Life)

Her daughter was murdered by Christa Pike in 1995. After 31 years of legal delays ended in a botched execution leaving Christa in a critical condition, she told the media in graphic detail she wished she could have used a box cutter on the killer herself and expressed approval at the killers suffering. She never gave up advocating for Christa's death and rejected any pleas for forgiveness despite Christa's traumatic childhood and mental disorders.

Hard to watch people being preyed upon, but if they believe and it does help them, is it immoral?

Is it really all that different from wearing makeup or getting plastic surgery?

And do you also feel that it’s far more immoral when the change is as drastic as it is in this case?

basically the ideology of Ozymandias from Watchmen

In one of the episodes of Rick and Morty, they visit a planet of people who, after death by suicide have their insides turned into completely edible, delicious spaghetti.

During one scene, Morty eats spaghetti from someone who was called Roger. Roger commit suicide willingly, gave permisison to use him as spaghetti. Roger was also serial killer, and cannibal.

Also it was now legal (the spagethi harvesting) in the planet that Roget is from

Basically ableism vs. Racism.

Or do you think he has already lost that spot to other characters? And at some point, do you think he genuinely ranked among the most depraved villains in all of fiction?

What do you think about Vukmir as a villain? Is he genuinely one of the most repulsive characters ever created, or are there villains who are even worse?