r/TikTokCringe • • Jul 19 '26

Discussion ER doctors warning parents against getting their kids e-bikes and e-scooters.

@beachgem10

24.3k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

83

u/outtherenow1 Jul 19 '26 edited Jul 19 '26

The community I teach in banned e-scooters because kids are absolutely so dumb on them. They have zero regard for cars in the road and pedestrians. It’s a legit hazard. The kids moan and complain about the ban.

I tell the kids, stop being an idiot, obey the rules of the road, and the ban may go away.

5

u/SCHawkTakeFlight Jul 19 '26

I really think bans are going to be necessary, at least age restricted bans. Its the kid and others at risk.

1

u/coldBulbasaur314 Jul 19 '26

It's how they ride it, not their age (barring very young children) that puts them at risk. Age restrictions here don't do much good and they cause a lot of harm via kids and adults who don't want to go everywhere with their ID on them being unable to access a good method of transportation and kids not getting the opportunity to learn to use them appropriately.

1

u/SCHawkTakeFlight Jul 20 '26

Yes I get that, but with age comes more maturity. At a minimum there should be laws around helmets and safe use that are enforced. I still think anything thats powered that requires riding in the street or riding in the street there should still be licensing/ age limits. We don't let 12 year olds drive cars or ride motorcycles on the road. And some of these actually end up falling into motorcycle territory.

1

u/coldBulbasaur314 Jul 20 '26

Yes I get that, but with age comes more maturity.

To an extent, yes. But for the most part maturity comes with experience. How are people supposed to get that maturity when they're not allowed to get the experience it requires?

At a minimum there should be laws around helmets and safe use that are enforced.

Helmet laws and safe use laws are reasonable, but that's not remotely the same as banning them completely.

I still think anything thats powered that requires riding in the street or riding in the street there should still be licensing/ age limits. 

Why? You haven't adequately defended this point, just said "I think it should be this way."

We don't let 12 year olds drive cars or ride motorcycles on the road. And some of these actually end up falling into motorcycle territory.

No true e-bike has its top speeds match those of motorcycles' top speeds. Enforcing speed limits is fine, but restricting e-bikes just because they can be fast is ridiculous. It's comparable to banning cars that can go 100mph from a road with a 25mph speed limit regardless of how fast the car's actually going.

And an e-bike is far closer to a bike than a motorcycle. Do you think kids should be banned from normal bikes too? If not, what's so special about e-bikes? 

1

u/Classic_Cat_3324 Jul 21 '26

I have never once seen a child on one of these actually pedaling. Most of the ones in my area go prohibitively fast and the kids are like 10 years old with no helmet or shoes 

2

u/AutumnFalls89 Jul 20 '26

I've seen kids ride across a main road going kitty corner form one sidewalk to another without even looking for traffic. 

1

u/tacticalTraumaLlama Jul 19 '26

The community I teach in banned e-scooters because kids are absolutely so dumb on them.

People think I'm paranoid, but I've been seeing more and more 'concerned citizens' clutching pearls over alt transport like scooters and ebikes now that they're getting popular, when really, it's just people wanting to squash it so there isn't more call for protected bike lanes and better pedestrian infrastructure.

3

u/Brock_Lobstweiler Jul 20 '26

I watched a 10 year old completely ignore a stop sign and haul ass out of a parking lot and then get smacked head on by a car (partially obstructed view for the car).

Kid was INSANELY lucky that it was 1) a car and not a jacked up brodozer or soccer mom suburban) and 2) going the speed limit.

No helmet and the kid's face was super fucked up. I was the first one to him and he couldn't tell me his name.

I live in Denver, which is generally bike friendly and has plenty of places to ride safely. But they have to GET there first.

2

u/AwesomeBees Jul 19 '26

This shit is hell even in countries with proper bike infrastructure. Its safer and I bet we see less accidents but people still get hurt really often

1

u/tacticalTraumaLlama Jul 19 '26

Ok, people get killed in car accidents all the time and we don't call for banning cars

1

u/Cancerisbetterthanu Jul 19 '26

Yeah we have insurance and licensing for cars.

1

u/tacticalTraumaLlama Jul 19 '26

Why would you need insurance or licensing for a bike?

1

u/AwesomeBees Jul 20 '26

People end up getting killed over them as it is

1

u/tacticalTraumaLlama Jul 20 '26

Citation needed of the number of other people killed by cyclists? The reason we license and insure driving is because it's a multi ton piece of metal that can easily kill others. Cyclists do not kill enough people to bother involving government in the issue

1

u/AwesomeBees Jul 20 '26

Yes you're right we should ban cars actually

1

u/tacticalTraumaLlama Jul 20 '26

Lol ok. You want to ban cars, then I suppose you want to heard everyone up and frog march them into Soviet style block apartments served by transit

-1

u/doberdevil Jul 19 '26

The community I teach in banned e-scooters because kids are absolutely so dumb on them.

This is stupid. Should we resort to banning anything people can't handle responsibly?

10

u/OldManLakey Jul 19 '26

I think there's at least a good case to be made that it's a good idea. If the reality is that most people can not handle riding scooters responsibly, and that they are a net negative to the community, than perhaps yes. Maybe it would be better to have a law banning them under penalty of confiscation for minors, and having some way to punish adults who ride them irresponsibly. We're talking about something that's not only annoying, but also dangerous. What do you think is a fair criterium for banning things?

1

u/doberdevil Jul 19 '26

If the reality is that most people can not handle riding scooters responsibly

How do you measure "most" in this assertion?

3

u/OldManLakey Jul 19 '26

I'm not sure. It actually doesn't need to be most - it could just be enough people to make it a problem for the community. There are lots of things that are regulated or banned for similar reasons, not because most people can't handle them responsibly, but because there are enough irresponsible people to make it a problem. Most people wouldn't drive 100 in a school zone, but a minority of assholes absolutely would. Most people wouldn't dump poisonous chemicals from their business into the community water table, but a minority of assholes would. It sounds like some assholes from the community in question were causing problems with scooters and got the hammer brought down, it sucks for the responsible riders. Again, maybe they should just regulate riding them instead of outright banning them. Kids don't usually carry ID, so it might get complicated keeping track of offenders. I'm taking it at face value that the scooter riders in that community were causing problems, but who knows if it was most of them.

1

u/doberdevil Jul 20 '26

I'm not sure. It actually doesn't need to be most - it could just be enough people to make it a problem for the community.

This is the important part though. We're talking about punishing everyone for the misdeeds of a few. I have no dog in this fight, and kids messing around don't bother me much.

What does bother me is when we decide to make laws that punish everyone because we don't take the time to understand how to study and solve the problem. Easier to just say "ban it".

9

u/RainRainThrowaway777 Jul 19 '26

Well there is an inherent problem with giving children the ability to go 30mph+ regardless of how that's achieved. It's probably appropriate to recognize when the introduction of a technology has negative impacts, and retract it.

6

u/outtherenow1 Jul 19 '26

Of course not. But if kids repeatedly are not willing to follow the laws and put their own lives at risk as a result it makes sense to ban e-scooters.

3

u/tacticalTraumaLlama Jul 19 '26

if kids repeatedly are not willing to follow the laws

Or you could just enforce the law instead of banning a legitimate alternative transport option for responsible people?

2

u/doberdevil Jul 19 '26

So we should ban cars because some people are irresponsible and continually refuse to follow laws and put other people's lives at risk?

3

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '26

[deleted]

0

u/doberdevil Jul 19 '26

An elderly lady in my neighborhood got hit by a kid on an ebike and died.

So ban them all?

2

u/EddieVanzetti Jul 19 '26

You're absolutely right, time to legalize meth and heroin.

1

u/doberdevil Jul 20 '26

News flash: Drugs won "The War on Drugs" a long time ago.